You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women’s and Men’s Voting Behavior in Global Perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Political Science Review, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0192512100214007 |
| Authors |
Ronald Inglehart, Pippa Norris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 532 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 80 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 3% |
| Spain | 8 | 2% |
| India | 7 | 1% |
| Canada | 6 | 1% |
| Poland | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Comoros | 4 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 49 | 9% |
| Unknown | 351 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 503 | 95% |
| Scientists | 14 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 443 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 424 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 14% |
| Researcher | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 70 | 16% |
| Unknown | 94 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 247 | 56% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 23 | 5% |
| Psychology | 19 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 18 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 6% |
| Unknown | 103 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 484. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#55,977
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from International Political Science Review
#1
of 661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,160
of 370,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Political Science Review
#1
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.