↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

International Consensus Guidelines for the Optimal Use of the Polymyxins: Endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious…

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacotherapy, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 2,522)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
308 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
600 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
406 Mendeley
Title
International Consensus Guidelines for the Optimal Use of the Polymyxins: Endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), International Society for Anti‐infective Pharmacology (ISAP), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP)
Published in
Pharmacotherapy, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/phar.2209
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian T. Tsuji, Jason M. Pogue, Alexandre P. Zavascki, Mical Paul, George L. Daikos, Alan Forrest, Daniele R. Giacobbe, Claudio Viscoli, Helen Giamarellou, Ilias Karaiskos, Donald Kaye, Johan W. Mouton, Vincent H. Tam, Visanu Thamlikitkul, Richard G. Wunderink, Jian Li, Roger L. Nation, Keith S. Kaye

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 308 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 406 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 45 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 11%
Researcher 36 9%
Student > Postgraduate 28 7%
Student > Bachelor 26 6%
Other 87 21%
Unknown 140 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 52 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 155 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 300. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#117,704
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacotherapy
#9
of 2,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,380
of 450,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacotherapy
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.