You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hepatitis B Vaccines and HPV Vaccines Have Been Hailed as Major Public Health Achievements in Preventing Cancer—Could a Schistosomiasis Vaccine be the Third?
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003598 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael H. Hsieh, Julia M. L. Brotherton, Afzal A. Siddiqui |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 44% |
Japan | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 30% |
Researcher | 5 | 22% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 22% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 22% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,069,736
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#2,083
of 9,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,812
of 280,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#47
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.