↓ Skip to main content

#RadEd: How and Why to Use Twitter for Online Radiology Education

Overview of attention for article published in Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
#RadEd: How and Why to Use Twitter for Online Radiology Education
Published in
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, February 2021
DOI 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2021.02.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilly Kauffman, Edmund M. Weisberg, Whitney Fishman Zember, Elliot K. Fishman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,688,319
of 17,120,105 outputs
Outputs from Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
#97
of 302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,616
of 237,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,120,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.