You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide for the Diagnosis of Childhood Asthma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12016-016-8573-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Songqi Tang, Yiqiang Xie, Conghu Yuan, Xiaoming Sun, Yubao Cui |
| Abstract |
The gold standard for diagnosing asthma in children is based on clinical history of respiratory symptoms, physical examination, and respiratory function testing. Recent advances indicate that a non-invasive measure of airway inflammation, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), provides objective data for use in asthma diagnosis. However, the diagnostic performance of FeNO in children with asthma has not been clearly defined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FeNO in the clinical determination of asthma in children. Databases of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDION, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles through March 31, 2016. A bivariate model was used for pooling estimates of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating curves (SROC) as the main diagnostic measures. In total, eight studies met the inclusion criteria, which included 2933 subjects. The pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and DOR for the detection of asthma in children were 0.79 [95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.64-0.89], 0.81 (95 % CI, 0.66-0.90), and 16.52 (95 % CI, 7.64-35.71). The SROC was 0.87 (95 % CI, 0.84-0.90). In brief, FeNO achieves a moderate diagnostic performance in the detection of asthma in children. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| Argentina | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 30% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,809,176
of 25,011,749 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#54
of 702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,301
of 373,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,011,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.