You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cationic Peptide Exposure Enhances Pulsed-Electric-Field-Mediated Membrane Disruption
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0092528 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephen M. Kennedy, Erik J. Aiken, Kaytlyn A. Beres, Adam R. Hahn, Samantha J. Kamin, Susan C. Hagness, John H. Booske, William L. Murphy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 21% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Librarian | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 9 | 47% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 16% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,722,978
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#94,727
of 201,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,082
of 226,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,257
of 5,415 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,415 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.