You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: Polymorphisms in Genes Affecting Interferon-γ Production and Th1 T Cell Differentiation Are Associated With Progression to Chagas Disease Cardiomyopathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2020.593759 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amanda Farage Frade-Barros, Barbara Maria Ianni, Sandrine Cabantous, Cristina Wide Pissetti, Bruno Saba, Hui Tzu Lin-Wang, Paula Buck, José Antonio Marin-Neto, André Schmidt, Fabrício Dias, Mario Hiroyuki Hirata, Marcelo Sampaio, Abílio Fragata, Alexandre Costa Pereira, Eduardo Donadi, Virmondes Rodrigues, Jorge Kalil, Christophe Chevillard, Edecio Cunha-Neto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2021.
All research outputs
#23,229,566
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#28,104
of 32,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370,448
of 428,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#772
of 890 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 890 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.