You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Safe From Harm: Learned, Instructed, and Symbolic Generalization Pathways of Human Threat-Avoidance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0047539 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Dymond, Michael W. Schlund, Bryan Roche, Jan De Houwer, Gary P. Freegard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 19% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 66 | 64% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,588,586
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#20,589
of 193,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,829
of 174,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#390
of 4,609 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,609 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.