↓ Skip to main content

On the analysis of movement smoothness

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
346 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
567 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the analysis of movement smoothness
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12984-015-0090-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sivakumar Balasubramanian, Alejandro Melendez-Calderon, Agnes Roby-Brami, Etienne Burdet

Abstract

Quantitative measures of smoothness play an important role in the assessment of sensorimotor impairment and motor learning. Traditionally, movement smoothness has been computed mainly for discrete movements, in particular arm, reaching and circle drawing, using kinematic data. There are currently very few studies investigating smoothness of rhythmic movements, and there is no systematic way of analysing the smoothness of such movements. There is also very little work on the smoothness of other movement related variables such as force, impedance etc. In this context, this paper presents the first step towards a unified framework for the analysis of smoothness of arbitrary movements and using various data. It starts with a systematic definition of movement smoothness and the different factors that influence smoothness, followed by a review of existing methods for quantifying the smoothness of discrete movements. A method is then introduced to analyse the smoothness of rhythmic movements by generalising the techniques developed for discrete movements. We finally propose recommendations for analysing smoothness of any general sensorimotor behaviour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 567 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 561 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 20%
Student > Master 84 15%
Researcher 82 14%
Student > Bachelor 48 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 80 14%
Unknown 131 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 186 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 8%
Neuroscience 41 7%
Sports and Recreations 36 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 4%
Other 76 13%
Unknown 160 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2016.
All research outputs
#18,466,238
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#987
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,915
of 389,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#23
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.