You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic Differences in Transcript Responses to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation Identify Tissue Functions Associated with Breast Cancer Susceptibility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0045394 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine M. Snijders, Francesco Marchetti, Sandhya Bhatnagar, Nadire Duru, Ju Han, Zhi Hu, Jian-Hua Mao, Joe W. Gray, Andrew J. Wyrobek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 11 | 32% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 97% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 27% |
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2012.
All research outputs
#1,584,232
of 24,701,106 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,862
of 213,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,821
of 180,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#347
of 4,616 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,616 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.