↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomic bias and international biodiversity conservation research

Overview of attention for article published in FACETS, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 481)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
63 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taxonomic bias and international biodiversity conservation research
Published in
FACETS, July 2016
DOI 10.1139/facets-2016-0011
Authors

Michael R. Donaldson, Nicholas J. Burnett, Douglas C. Braun, Cory D. Suski, Scott G. Hinch, Steven J. Cooke, Jeremy T. Kerr

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 275 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 21%
Student > Bachelor 53 19%
Student > Master 38 14%
Researcher 33 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 56 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 43%
Environmental Science 55 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 65 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#441,646
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from FACETS
#36
of 481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,782
of 381,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FACETS
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them