↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomic bias and international biodiversity conservation research

Overview of attention for article published in Facets, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
73 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Taxonomic bias and international biodiversity conservation research
Published in
Facets, January 2016
DOI 10.1139/facets-2016-0011
Authors

Michael R. Donaldson, Nicholas J. Burnett, Douglas C. Braun, Cory D. Suski, Scott G. Hinch, Steven J. Cooke, Jeremy T. Kerr

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Canada 2 5%
Italy 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 35 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 27%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 73%
Environmental Science 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2017.
All research outputs
#87,781
of 8,418,826 outputs
Outputs from Facets
#4
of 57 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,086
of 260,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Facets
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,418,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them