↓ Skip to main content

Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009593.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jerry S Zifodya, Jonah S Kreniske, Ian Schiller, Mikashmi Kohli, Nandini Dendukuri, Samuel G Schumacher, Eleanor A Ochodo, Frederick Haraka, Alice A Zwerling, Madhukar Pai, Karen R Steingart, David J Horne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 9%
Unspecified 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 14 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,270,503
of 18,203,597 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,205
of 11,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,817
of 306,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,203,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.