↓ Skip to main content

Antioxidants for chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antioxidants for chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008176.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Jun, Vinod Venkataraman, Mona Razavian, Bruce Cooper, Sophia Zoungas, Toshiharu Ninomiya, Angela C Webster, Vlado Perkovic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
France 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 161 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 18%
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Researcher 17 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 44 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2013.
All research outputs
#6,112,503
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,916
of 12,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,044
of 175,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.