↓ Skip to main content

A Histopathologic Review of Undiagnosed Neoplasms in 205 Evisceration Specimens

Overview of attention for article published in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Histopathologic Review of Undiagnosed Neoplasms in 205 Evisceration Specimens
Published in
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, January 2012
DOI 10.1097/iop.0b013e31825ca5d8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo A. Novais, Bruno F. Fernandes, Luiz F. Pacheco, Sebastian Di Cesare, Cristina Miyamoto, Tiago A. Briccoli, Miguel N. Burnier

Abstract

Evisceration and enucleation are 2 ophthalmic surgeries used to treat blind and painful eyes. The benefits of evisceration over enucleation are many but this procedure is contraindicated in cases of a suspected intra-ocular mass. Given the lack of such studies in the literature, our aim was to review a large sample of eviscerated specimens to document the prevalence of unexpected neoplasms.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 75%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2012.
All research outputs
#2,931,352
of 4,507,280 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#211
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,827
of 81,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.