↓ Skip to main content

‘Learning Is Not a Spectator Sport’: Oral History Archives and Simulation in the Sport History Classroom

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of the History of Sport, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Learning Is Not a Spectator Sport’: Oral History Archives and Simulation in the Sport History Classroom
Published in
The International Journal of the History of Sport, February 2021
DOI 10.1080/09523367.2020.1868441
Authors

Smith, Andrew R. M.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,162,164
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of the History of Sport
#199
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,947
of 268,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of the History of Sport
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them