You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of Preventive Supplementation with Zinc and Other Micronutrients on Non-Malarial Morbidity in Tanzanian Pre-School Children: A Randomized Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0041630 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jacobien Veenemans, Laura R. A. Schouten, Maarten J. Ottenhof, Theo G. Mank, Donald R. A. Uges, Erasto V. Mbugi, Ayşe Y. Demir, Rob J. Kraaijenhagen, Huub F. J. Savelkoul, Hans Verhoef |
Abstract |
The efficacy of preventive zinc supplementation against diarrhea and respiratory illness may depend on simultaneous supplementation with other micronutrients. We aimed to assess the effect of supplementation with zinc and multiple micronutrients on diarrhea and other causes of non-malarial morbidity. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 118 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 17% |
Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Other | 28 | 23% |
Unknown | 25 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,253,344
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,937
of 193,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,538
of 164,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,625
of 4,050 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,050 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.