You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MOCAT: A Metagenomics Assembly and Gene Prediction Toolkit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0047656 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jens Roat Kultima, Shinichi Sunagawa, Junhua Li, Weineng Chen, Hua Chen, Daniel R. Mende, Manimozhiyan Arumugam, Qi Pan, Binghang Liu, Junjie Qin, Jun Wang, Peer Bork |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 22% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Egypt | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 8 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 549 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 2% |
| Germany | 8 | 1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 494 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 146 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 129 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 79 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 4% |
| Other | 86 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 261 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 94 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 34 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 51 | 9% |
| Unknown | 64 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,108,773
of 23,864,690 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#26,633
of 203,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,407
of 177,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#494
of 4,761 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,761 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.