You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enrichment and Stratification for Predementia Alzheimer Disease Clinical Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0047739 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dominic Holland, Linda K. McEvoy, Rahul S. Desikan, Anders M. Dale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Egypt | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 27% |
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,422,295
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#135,563
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,845
of 197,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,332
of 4,802 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,802 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.