You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bio-Logic Builder: A Non-Technical Tool for Building Dynamical, Qualitative Models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0046417 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomáš Helikar, Bryan Kowal, Alex Madrahimov, Manish Shrestha, Jay Pedersen, Kahani Limbu, Ishwor Thapa, Thaine Rowley, Rahul Satalkar, Naomi Kochi, John Konvalina, Jim A. Rogers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Latvia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 23% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2012.
All research outputs
#13,294,883
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#105,871
of 193,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,051
of 175,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,275
of 4,760 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,760 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.