| Title |
Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30370-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ulf Ekelund, Jostein Steene-Johannessen, Wendy J Brown, Morten Wang Fagerland, Neville Owen, Kenneth E Powell, Adrian Bauman, I-Min Lee, Lancet Physical Activity Series 2 Executive Committe, Lancet Sedentary Behaviour Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,899 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 324 | 17% |
| United States | 233 | 12% |
| Spain | 115 | 6% |
| Australia | 85 | 4% |
| Canada | 73 | 4% |
| Ireland | 35 | 2% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 31 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 26 | 1% |
| Finland | 21 | 1% |
| Other | 277 | 15% |
| Unknown | 679 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1317 | 69% |
| Scientists | 322 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 222 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 34 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,551 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2519 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 394 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 338 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 297 | 12% |
| Researcher | 264 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 151 | 6% |
| Other | 443 | 17% |
| Unknown | 664 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 457 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 445 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 274 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 98 | 4% |
| Psychology | 97 | 4% |
| Other | 377 | 15% |
| Unknown | 803 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4789. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2024.
All research outputs
#882
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#64
of 43,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5
of 381,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#1
of 365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.