The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine expert panel recommendations on point-of-care ultrasound education and training for regional anesthesiologists and pain physicians—part II: recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/rapm-2021-102561 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen C Haskins, Yuriy Bronshteyn, Anahi Perlas, Kariem El-Boghdadly, Joshua Zimmerman, Marcos Silva, Karen Boretsky, Vincent Chan, Richelle Kruisselbrink, Melissa Byrne, Nadia Hernandez, Jan Boublik, William Clark Manson, Rosemary Hogg, Jonathan N Wilkinson, Hari Kalagara, Jemiel Nejim, Davinder Ramsingh, Hariharan Shankar, Antoun Nader, Dmitri Souza, Samer Narouze |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 9% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Qatar | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 54 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 25% |
| Scientists | 11 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 28 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#876,086
of 26,322,284 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#72
of 2,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,463
of 456,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,322,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.