You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transcriptome profiling of lncRNA and co-expression networks in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by RNA sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-016-5227-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuan Li, Xuejiao Shi, Wenhui Yang, Zhiliang Lu, Pan Wang, Zhaoli Chen, Jie He |
| Abstract |
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as crucial regulators of cancer. To identify novel targets for further study in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), we performed a genome-wide analysis of lncRNA expression in 12 ESCC tumor and normal tissues. Publicly available RNA-seq data were downloaded from the NCBI, GEO, and Co-LncRNA databases, and lncRNA and messenger RNA (mRNA) expression profiles were analyzed. In total, 127 lncRNAs were found to be differentially expressed, with a greater than fourfold change in ESCC tumor tissues compared with normal tissues. Among these lncRNAs, 98 were upregulated and 29 downregulated. Moreover, 1469 network nodes and 1720 connection edges between 119 lncRNAs and 1350 coding genes were integrated into the lncRNA and mRNA co-expression network. Bioinformatic analysis using GO terms revealed that these dysregulated lncRNAs are associated with developmental processes, proteinaceous extracellular matrix, and protein binding activity, with ECM-receptor interaction and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway enrichment. Lastly, qRT-PCR results verified two significantly upregulated lncRNAs and three significantly downregulated lncRNAs in 50 pairs of ESCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues. These results reveal the landscape of ESCC-associated lncRNAs and co-expression networks, providing important insight regarding the lncRNAs involved in ESCC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 48% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,857,330
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#969
of 2,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,791
of 364,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#18
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,623 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.