You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of Easy-to-Use Protein-Rich Energy Bar on Energy Balance, Physical Activity and Performance during 8 Days of Sustained Physical Exertion
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0047771 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Minna M. Tanskanen, Klaas R. Westerterp, Arja L. Uusitalo, Mustafa Atalay, Keijo Häkkinen, Hannu O. Kinnunen, Heikki Kyröläinen |
Abstract |
Previous military studies have shown an energy deficit during a strenuous field training course (TC). This study aimed to determine the effects of energy bar supplementation on energy balance, physical activity (PA), physical performance and well-being and to evaluate ad libitum fluid intake during wintertime 8-day strenuous TC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Egypt | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 103 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
Researcher | 10 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 12% |
Unknown | 31 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 19% |
Sports and Recreations | 14 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Psychology | 8 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 12% |
Unknown | 37 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,153,088
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#115,608
of 193,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,974
of 175,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,531
of 4,760 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,760 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.