↓ Skip to main content

Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
41 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009260.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Reichow, Erin E Barton, Brian A Boyd, Kara Hume

Abstract

The rising prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) increases the need for evidence-based behavioral treatments to lessen the impact of symptoms on children's functioning. At present, there are no curative or psychopharmacological therapies to effectively treat all symptoms of the disorder. Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI), a treatment based on the principles of applied behavior analysis delivered for multiple years at an intensity of 20 to 40 hours per week, is one of the more well-established treatments for ASD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Canada 3 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 268 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 22%
Researcher 48 17%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 58 21%
Unknown 23 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 76 27%
Social Sciences 31 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 31 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#303,442
of 15,519,002 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#719
of 11,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,116
of 149,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,519,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.