↓ Skip to main content

Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
41 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
264 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009260.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Reichow, Erin E Barton, Brian A Boyd, Kara Hume

Abstract

The rising prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) increases the need for evidence-based behavioral treatments to lessen the impact of symptoms on children's functioning. At present, there are no curative or psychopharmacological therapies to effectively treat all symptoms of the disorder. Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI), a treatment based on the principles of applied behavior analysis delivered for multiple years at an intensity of 20 to 40 hours per week, is one of the more well-established treatments for ASD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 306 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 21%
Researcher 52 16%
Student > Bachelor 41 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 66 21%
Unknown 31 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 78 25%
Social Sciences 34 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 7%
Neuroscience 15 5%
Other 39 12%
Unknown 43 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#365,012
of 17,429,432 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#810
of 11,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,302
of 156,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,429,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.