↓ Skip to main content

The Sources of Strength Australia Project: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Sources of Strength Australia Project: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1475-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison L. Calear, Jacqueline L. Brewer, Philip J. Batterham, Andrew Mackinnon, Peter A. Wyman, Mark LoMurray, Fiona Shand, Dominique Kazan, Helen Christensen

Abstract

The school system has been identified as an ideal setting for the implementation of prevention and early intervention programs for suicide. However, in Australia, suicide-prevention programs that are routinely delivered in the schools are lacking. Internationally, evidence exists for the effectiveness of peer-led interventions that take a social connectedness approach to improve help-seeking for suicide. The aim of the current trial is to test the effectiveness of the Sources of Strength program to promote help-seeking for suicide in adolescents in Australian high schools. This study is a two-arm, cluster-randomised, controlled trial that will compare the evidence-based Sources of Strength program to a wait-list control condition. Sixteen Australian high schools will be recruited to the trial, with all adolescents in years 7 to 10 (12-16 years of age) invited to participate. Peer leaders from intervention-condition schools will receive training in the Sources of Strength program and will integrate positive messages, across 3 months, with the support of adult advisors. Activities may take the form of class presentations, posters, videos, and messages on social media sites and will aim to change help-seeking norms, strengthen youth-adult connections, and promote positive coping. The primary outcome measure for the study is help-seeking intentions, whereas secondary outcomes include help-seeking behaviour, help-seeking attitudes and norms, referral of distressed peers, availability of adult help, positive coping, and suicidal behaviour. Data will be collected pre-intervention, post-intervention (after the initial 3 months of messaging), and at the end of the first (6-month follow-up) and the second year after implementation (18-month follow-up). Primary analyses will compare changes in help-seeking intentions for the intervention condition relative to the wait-list control condition using mixed-effect repeated-measures analyses to account for clustering within schools. If proven effective, this universal social connectedness program for suicide could be more widely delivered in Australian high schools, providing a valuable new resource. The Sources of Strength program has the potential to significantly contribute to the mental health of young people in Australia by improving help-seeking for suicide. The findings from this research will also contribute to the evidence-base for peer-leadership programs internationally. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12616000048482 . Registered on 19 January 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 281 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 97 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 7%
Social Sciences 17 6%
Unspecified 8 3%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 110 39%