You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
National Health Insurance Fund’s relationship to retail drug outlets: a Tanzania case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40545-021-00303-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martha Embrey, Romuald Mbwasi, Elizabeth Shekalaghe, Jafary Liana, Suleiman Kimatta, Gasto Ignace, Angel Dillip, Tamara Hafner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,049,511
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#248
of 421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,293
of 420,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#20
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.