You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiac involvement in COVID-19 patients: mid-term follow up by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00710-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui Wang, Ruili Li, Zhen Zhou, Hong Jiang, Zixu Yan, Xinyan Tao, Hongjun Li, Lei Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 47 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 54 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,054,448
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#624
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,119
of 454,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.