You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social media, FOAMed in medical education and knowledge sharing: Local experiences with international perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tjem.2016.07.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arif Alper Cevik, Gokhan Aksel, Haldun Akoglu, Serkan Emre Eroglu, Nurettin Ozgur Dogan, Yusuf Ali Altunci |
| Abstract |
Social media, through the Internet and other web-based technologies, have become a means of communication and knowledge-sharing. In this article, we provide details about the social media traffic of various scientific activities, the organizations of which we have played an active role in. We also provide information in our native language through our FOAMed website, which has been published for about 30 months, with us acting as editors. We are comparing these local and limited ventures with examples from the world and aim to remind that social media sources play a very important role in sharing knowledge in medical training and encouraging local initiatives, like ours, with limited resources. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 10 | 43% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 26% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,535,983
of 24,413,320 outputs
Outputs from Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine
#10
of 221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,883
of 343,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,413,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.