↓ Skip to main content

Identification of epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate as an active constituent in tea extract that suppresses transcriptional up-regulations of the histamine H1 receptor and interleukin-4 genes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Traditional Medicines, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate as an active constituent in tea extract that suppresses transcriptional up-regulations of the histamine H1 receptor and interleukin-4 genes
Published in
Journal of Traditional Medicines, December 2008
DOI 10.11339/jtm.25.133
Authors

Chiyo MATSUSHITA, Hiroyuki MIZUGUCHI, Hitoshi NIINO, Yuko SAGESAKA, Keisuke MASUYAMA, Hiroyuki FUKUI

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,025,615
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Traditional Medicines
#1
of 8 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,067
of 181,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Traditional Medicines
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them