You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices and Emotional Reactions among Residents of Avian Influenza (H5N1) Hit Communities in Vietnam
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0047560 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toshie Manabe, Tran Thuy Hanh, Doan Manh Lam, Do Thi Hong Van, Pham Thi Phuong Thuy, Dinh Thi Thanh Huyen, Tran Thi Mai Phuong, Dang Hung Minh, Jin Takasaki, Ngo Quy Chau, Ly Quoc Toan, Koichiro Kudo |
| Abstract |
Awareness of individuals' knowledge and predicting their behavior and emotional reactions is crucial when evaluating clinical preparedness for influenza pandemics with a highly pathogenic virus. Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) relating to avian influenza (H5N1) virus infection among residents in communities where H5N1 patients occurred in Vietnam has not been reported. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Vietnam | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 9% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,171,868
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,805
of 193,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,406
of 176,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,128
of 4,783 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,783 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.