↓ Skip to main content

Linking the historic 2011 Mississippi River flood to coastal wetland sedimentation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Linking the historic 2011 Mississippi River flood to coastal wetland sedimentation
Published in
Nature Geoscience, October 2012
DOI 10.1038/ngeo1615
Authors

Federico Falcini, Nicole S. Khan, Leonardo Macelloni, Benjamin P. Horton, Carol B. Lutken, Karen L. McKee, Rosalia Santoleri, Simone Colella, Chunyan Li, Gianluca Volpe, Marco D’Emidio, Alessandro Salusti, Douglas J. Jerolmack

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 116 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 25%
Researcher 27 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Professor 7 6%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 35%
Environmental Science 29 24%
Engineering 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Physics and Astronomy 4 3%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 25 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,710,745
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#2,211
of 3,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,427
of 176,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#47
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 97.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.