You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular approaches to trematode systematics: ‘best practice’ and implications for future study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Parasitology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11230-016-9631-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isabel Blasco-Costa, Scott C. Cutmore, Terrence L. Miller, Matthew J. Nolan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,575,286
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Parasitology
#587
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,904
of 316,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Parasitology
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.