You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Harnessing Twitter to empower scientific engagement and communication: The ISTH 2020 virtual congress experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/rth2.12478 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maha Othman, Matthew Cormier, Geoffrey D. Barnes, Shane P. Comer, Jean M. Connors, Frederik Denorme, Alok A. Khorana, Pedro Henrique Las Casas, Shravan Morla, Joshua Muia, Fionnuala Ní Áinle, Kirk A. Taylor, Dianne E. van der Wal, Angela C. Weyand, Michelle Lavin |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 35% |
| Australia | 5 | 8% |
| Canada | 5 | 8% |
| Ireland | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 46% |
| Scientists | 19 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,030,906
of 23,882,990 outputs
Outputs from Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
#64
of 828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,196
of 510,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
#6
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,882,990 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.