↓ Skip to main content

Harnessing Twitter to empower scientific engagement and communication: The ISTH 2020 virtual congress experience

Overview of attention for article published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Harnessing Twitter to empower scientific engagement and communication: The ISTH 2020 virtual congress experience
Published in
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/rth2.12478
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maha Othman, Matthew Cormier, Geoffrey D. Barnes, Shane P. Comer, Jean M. Connors, Frederik Denorme, Alok A. Khorana, Pedro Henrique Las Casas, Shravan Morla, Joshua Muia, Fionnuala Ní Áinle, Kirk A. Taylor, Dianne E. van der Wal, Angela C. Weyand, Michelle Lavin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 60%
Unspecified 1 20%
Librarian 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 20%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,002,309
of 17,418,198 outputs
Outputs from Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
#65
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,856
of 259,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,418,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.