You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance predictors of heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the role of myocardial replacement fibrosis and the microcirculation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00720-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claire E. Raphael, Frances Mitchell, Gajen Sunthar Kanaganayagam, Alphonsus C. Liew, Elisa Di Pietro, Miguel Silva Vieira, Lina Kanapeckaite, Simon Newsome, John Gregson, Ruth Owen, Li-Yueh Hsu, Vassilis Vassiliou, Robert Cooper, Aamir Ali MRCP, Tevfik F. Ismail, Brandon Wong, Kristi Sun, Peter Gatehouse, David Firmin, Stuart Cook, Michael Frenneaux, Andrew Arai, Rory O’Hanlon, Dudley J. Pennell, Sanjay K. Prasad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
Peru | 1 | 13% |
Pakistan | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 46% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,469,176
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#438
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,512
of 454,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#8
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.