You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ancestry of the Iban Is Predominantly Southeast Asian: Genetic Evidence from Autosomal, Mitochondrial, and Y Chromosomes
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0016338 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tatum S. Simonson, Jinchuan Xing, Robert Barrett, Edward Jerah, Peter Loa, Yuhua Zhang, W. Scott Watkins, David J. Witherspoon, Chad D. Huff, Scott Woodward, Bryan Mowry, Lynn B. Jorde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 3 | 38% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Chile | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
Lecturer | 6 | 7% |
Professor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 21% |
Unknown | 16 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 34% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
Arts and Humanities | 7 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,283,808
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#16,134
of 223,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,307
of 194,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#92
of 1,286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.