↓ Skip to main content

No Association of Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus-Related Viruses with Prostate Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No Association of Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus-Related Viruses with Prostate Cancer
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019065
Pubmed ID
Authors

William M. Switzer, Hongwei Jia, HaoQiang Zheng, Shaohua Tang, Walid Heneine

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2011.
All research outputs
#2,822,543
of 23,287,285 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#36,372
of 198,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,515
of 111,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#329
of 1,579 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,287,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,579 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.