The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advice to rest in bed versus advice to stay active for acute low‐back pain and sciatica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007612.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin Thuve Dahm, Kjetil G Brurberg, Gro Jamtvedt, Kåre Birger Hagen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 21% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 322 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 16% |
| Researcher | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 60 | 18% |
| Unknown | 79 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 15% |
| Psychology | 15 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 94 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#513,326
of 26,156,431 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#857
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,198
of 99,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,156,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.