↓ Skip to main content

Advice to rest in bed versus advice to stay active for acute low-back pain and sciatica

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advice to rest in bed versus advice to stay active for acute low-back pain and sciatica
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007612.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin Thuve Dahm, Kjetil G Brurberg, Gro Jamtvedt, Kåre Birger Hagen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 241 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 20%
Student > Master 48 20%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Postgraduate 20 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Other 52 21%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 16%
Psychology 13 5%
Sports and Recreations 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 51 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#306,131
of 17,663,872 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#649
of 11,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,390
of 339,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,663,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.