↓ Skip to main content

Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
60 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
476 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001351.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea D Furlan, Maurits W van Tulder, Dan Cherkin, Hiroshi Tsukayama, Lixing Lao, Bart W Koes, Brian M Berman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 466 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 116 24%
Student > Master 81 17%
Student > Postgraduate 43 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 7%
Researcher 30 6%
Other 89 19%
Unknown 86 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 204 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 80 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Psychology 14 3%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Other 45 9%
Unknown 103 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 179. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#120,791
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#242
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,099
of 248,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.