↓ Skip to main content

Manual material handling advice and assistive devices for preventing and treating back pain in workers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
30 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Manual material handling advice and assistive devices for preventing and treating back pain in workers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005958.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jos H Verbeek, Kari-Pekka Martimo, Jaro Karppinen, P Paul FM Kuijer, Eira Viikari-Juntura, Esa-Pekka Takala

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 268 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 17%
Student > Bachelor 43 16%
Researcher 30 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 57 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 14%
Psychology 16 6%
Engineering 15 5%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 75 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,061,137
of 21,895,296 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,459
of 12,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,464
of 376,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,895,296 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.