You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing Nutritional Diversity of Cropping Systems in African Villages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0021235 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roseline Remans, Dan F. B. Flynn, Fabrice DeClerck, Willy Diru, Jessica Fanzo, Kaitlyn Gaynor, Isabel Lambrecht, Joseph Mudiope, Patrick K. Mutuo, Phelire Nkhoma, David Siriri, Clare Sullivan, Cheryl A. Palm |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 4% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 385 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 101 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 71 | 17% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 13% |
| Unknown | 77 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 117 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 54 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 32 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 14% |
| Unknown | 97 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,346,970
of 23,287,285 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#17,547
of 198,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,162
of 101,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#176
of 1,871 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,287,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,871 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.