You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Sinister Bias for Calling Fouls in Soccer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011667 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander Kranjec, Matthew Lehet, Bianca Bromberger, Anjan Chatterjee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Algeria | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Comoros | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 71 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 31% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 25% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#440,263
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,153
of 226,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,100
of 106,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#26
of 755 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 755 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.