You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ten Simple Rules for Making Good Oral Presentations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030077 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip E Bourne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,878 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 138 | 5% |
| Mexico | 138 | 5% |
| India | 89 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 83 | 3% |
| Colombia | 74 | 3% |
| Spain | 72 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 72 | 3% |
| South Africa | 63 | 2% |
| Kenya | 58 | 2% |
| Other | 738 | 26% |
| Unknown | 1353 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2281 | 79% |
| Scientists | 409 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 164 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,518 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 46 | 3% |
| Germany | 21 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 1% |
| Brazil | 19 | 1% |
| Canada | 11 | <1% |
| India | 11 | <1% |
| France | 10 | <1% |
| Spain | 10 | <1% |
| Japan | 7 | <1% |
| Other | 63 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1300 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 331 | 22% |
| Researcher | 301 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 195 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 128 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 84 | 6% |
| Other | 338 | 22% |
| Unknown | 141 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 482 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 144 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 92 | 6% |
| Psychology | 71 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 69 | 5% |
| Other | 468 | 31% |
| Unknown | 192 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1531. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,760
of 25,889,720 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7
of 9,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3
of 87,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,889,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.