↓ Skip to main content

Stalking the Fourth Domain in Metagenomic Data: Searching for, Discovering, and Interpreting Novel, Deep Branches in Marker Gene Phylogenetic Trees

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
12 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
478 Mendeley
citeulike
24 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stalking the Fourth Domain in Metagenomic Data: Searching for, Discovering, and Interpreting Novel, Deep Branches in Marker Gene Phylogenetic Trees
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongying Wu, Martin Wu, Aaron Halpern, Douglas B. Rusch, Shibu Yooseph, Marvin Frazier, J. Craig Venter, Jonathan A. Eisen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 478 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 32 7%
Brazil 8 2%
France 8 2%
Sweden 6 1%
Germany 6 1%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Canada 5 1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 386 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 133 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 25%
Student > Master 48 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 34 7%
Student > Bachelor 33 7%
Other 94 20%
Unknown 18 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 329 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 7%
Environmental Science 21 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 2%
Other 38 8%
Unknown 35 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#456,166
of 24,701,594 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,418
of 213,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,598
of 124,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#37
of 1,428 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,428 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.