You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spondarthritis in the Triassic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0013425 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan Carlos Cisneros, Uiara Gomes Cabral, Frikkie de Beer, Ross Damiani, Daniel Costa Fortier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2010.
All research outputs
#1,817,745
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#23,213
of 198,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,673
of 100,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#138
of 878 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 878 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.