You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cartilaginous Epiphyses in Extant Archosaurs and Their Implications for Reconstructing Limb Function in Dinosaurs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0013120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Casey M. Holliday, Ryan C. Ridgely, Jayc C. Sedlmayr, Lawrence M. Witmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 66 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2023.
All research outputs
#749,613
of 24,703,339 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,107
of 213,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,048
of 103,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#43
of 930 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,703,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 930 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.