You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Post-Cranial Skeletons of Hypothyroid Cretins Show a Similar Anatomical Mosaic as Homo floresiensis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0013018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles Oxnard, Peter J. Obendorf, Ben J. Kefford |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 24% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 16% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2016.
All research outputs
#961,636
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,951
of 198,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,929
of 99,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#58
of 922 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 922 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.