You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fellatio by Fruit Bats Prolongs Copulation Time
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0007595 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Min Tan, Gareth Jones, Guangjian Zhu, Jianping Ye, Tiyu Hong, Shanyi Zhou, Shuyi Zhang, Libiao Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 361 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 55 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 37 | 10% |
| Japan | 17 | 5% |
| France | 9 | 2% |
| Canada | 8 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Spain | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 1% |
| Sweden | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Unknown | 179 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 287 | 80% |
| Scientists | 55 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 590 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 3% |
| Germany | 9 | 2% |
| Brazil | 9 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 1% |
| Spain | 6 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Argentina | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 27 | 5% |
| Unknown | 501 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 151 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 132 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 6% |
| Other | 109 | 18% |
| Unknown | 50 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 364 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 41 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 3% |
| Psychology | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 81 | 14% |
| Unknown | 49 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 628. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#36,409
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#603
of 226,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40
of 110,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2
of 555 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 555 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.