↓ Skip to main content

Transport and release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to wildlife

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3587 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transport and release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to wildlife
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, July 2009
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2008.0284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma L. Teuten, Jovita M. Saquing, Detlef R. U. Knappe, Morton A. Barlaz, Susanne Jonsson, Annika Bjrn, Steven J. Rowland, Richard C. Thompson, Tamara S. Galloway, Rei Yamashita, Daisuke Ochi, Yutaka Watanuki, Charles Moore, Pham Hung Viet, Touch Seang Tana, Maricar Prudente, Ruchaya Boonyatumanond, Mohamad P. Zakaria, Kongsap Akkhavong, Yuko Ogata, Hisashi Hirai, Satoru Iwasa, Kaoruko Mizukawa, Yuki Hagino, Ayako Imamura, Mahua Saha, Hideshige Takada

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,587 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 <1%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Brazil 7 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Belgium 4 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Other 24 <1%
Unknown 3505 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 656 18%
Student > Master 640 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 439 12%
Researcher 382 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 132 4%
Other 438 12%
Unknown 900 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 853 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 645 18%
Chemistry 218 6%
Engineering 211 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 161 4%
Other 456 13%
Unknown 1043 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 272. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#134,166
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#99
of 7,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280
of 125,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#6
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.