You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dental Microwear and Diet of the Plio-Pleistocene Hominin Paranthropus boisei
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002044 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter S. Ungar, Frederick E. Grine, Mark F. Teaford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 296 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 17% |
| Researcher | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 109 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 59 | 18% |
| Arts and Humanities | 45 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 252. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#149,064
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,273
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217
of 92,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#6
of 330 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 330 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.